home > services 

Adaptive Path Blog

The Team

Archive for the 'AP Staff' Category

Starting the CEO Search

by AP Executive Team on April 9th, 2008

There’s a lot of activity around Adaptive Path these days. With the impending release of our book Subject to Change, our upcoming events rapidly selling out, our growing presence in Austin, and our expanding range of interesting projects for clients around the world — there’s more going on here than ever.

Right now, all three of us (Peter, Jesse, and Bryan) work as a team to keep Adaptive Path growing culturally, creatively, and financially. But with all the opportunities opening up for the company, we’ve decided the time is right to add a new perspective to the mix. That’s why we’re announcing today that we’re on the lookout for a CEO to add to our executive team.

We don’t want to replace any of the current executives. We want someone with a unique mix of business experience, operational savvy, and leadership qualities. We’d like someone to help us build on our successes, and make the most of our exceptional opportunities, without sacrificing the culture and values that have made our success possible.

We figured there’s a good chance that Adaptive Path’s ideal CEO either already reads this blog, or knows someone who does. So if you think you know the right person for this job (even if that’s you), send an email to bryan dot mason at adaptivepath dot com. We’d love to hear from you!

Adaptive Path at SXSW 2008

by Dan on March 6th, 2008

Like, well, every year, a gaggle of Adaptive Pathers are headed to SXSW Interactive. Find us at the parties, BBQ joints, and our sessions:

Friday:

Todd Wilkens reads from Adaptive Path’s new book Subject to Change from 4:00-5:00.

Ryan Freitas and AP Founder Lane Becker dole out the punishment in Battle Decks II from 5:00-6:00.

Monday:

Bryan Mason and Sarah Nelson offer up 10 Tips for Managing a Creative Environment from 3:30-4:30.

I’ll be Feeding the Creativity Beast in a core conversation from 5:00-6:00.

Tuesday:

Ryan Freitas provokes a core conversation by asking Do You Have to Disappear Completely to Get Things Done? from 5:00-6:00.

Design Research Lies!

by Dan on February 3rd, 2008

The talk I gave last fall at the Institute of Design’s 2007 Design Research conference is now available as a video!

It’s probably one of the funniest (and most fun) talks I’ve ever given. Enjoy!

Seinfeld and Merholz Agree

by Dan Harrelson on November 4th, 2007

Dan noticed that on the Nov 1 episode of The Daily Show, Jerry Seinfeld brought the term “blog” to task.

“Is that the worst new word of the culture, blog? It’s so unattractive. It’s like something that you spit up and its, it has like, it congeals, and is, you know, and you kick dirt on it.”
- Jerry Seinfeld

Peter, who coined the term back in 1998 agrees with Jerry:

“I like that it’s roughly onomatopoeic of vomiting. These sites (mine included!) tend to be a kind of information upchucking.”
- Peter Merholz, August 30, 1999, email to Keith Dawson

How to Make the Most of Engaging a Design Firm

by Adaptive Path on October 25th, 2007

A client asked us for some advice on how to get the most out of working with Adaptive Path (or any design firm, for that matter). We polled the staff, and put our responses into an essay.

Enjoy!

Dan Saffer on Read/WriteWeb

by Dan Harrelson on October 4th, 2007

Our very own Dan Saffer was recently interviewed for a podcast on Read/WriteWeb. As Experience Design Director, Dan has recently been seeing a lot of traction, like this interview, from his recent “Call to Arms” post on the Adaptive Path blog. If you are an interaction designer or even just interested in recent developments with device interfaces, please check out and contribute to Dan’s Interactive Gestures wiki.

peterme in London, 2-5 September

by peterme on August 27th, 2007

Just a quick note that I’m speaking at the d.construct event next week, and before then, plan spending 2-5 September in London. I’d love to meet up with folks for breakfasts, lunches, and coffees, and I’m also eager on visiting companies, talking to teams, that kind of thing. Just email me (peterme at this domain name) to set something up.

Additionally, there’s an Anthrodesign/UX Meetup on 4 September after work at the John Snow. Sign up on Upcoming.

Rich Web Experience 2007 in San Jose

by david on August 22nd, 2007

I’m going to be speaking at the fast approaching and local Rich Web Experience 2007. It’s in San Jose on Sept 6-8 and it’s put on by the excellent No Fluff Just Stuff folks. Several things to recommend this year’s event:

  1. 90 minute sessions: It can be hard on the speakers, but as an attendee it’s great seeing topics explored more in depth than shorter sessions allow.
  2. Our own Jesse James Garrett will be one of the keynote speakers.
  3. One of the few conferences that has schwag worth paying attention to. This time it’s a video ipod or a Nintendo Wii.
  4. Bill Scott will be unveiling his Ajax prototyping library. I got a sneak peak at our recent UX Week event and it’s amazing.
  5. You can get $200 off with the promo code ‘nfjs2007speaker200’.

Come if you can and say hello.

UXweek2007: Learning from Adaptive Path’s Mistakes

by Dan on August 15th, 2007

Bryan Mason, Sarah Nelson, Ryan Freitas, Jesse James Garrett

Failure is a by-product of pushing yourself. You can’t escape it.

When We Take The Wrong Project

JJG: What makes a good project for us for me is a handful of criteria. Most important thing is interesting problems to solve. Problems we haven’t had a chance to sink our teeth into. Second thing is good people to collaborate with. Work in close collaboration with our clients. Best clients are the ones we can learn from. Looking for projects that can have an impact in the world. Clients have to have the ability and commitment to execute what we do. And willing to spend the money to bring us in. If all the other things are in place, the dollars are less important.

BM: When do we get that wrong?

JJG: When we misplace our priorities. When we let one factor to override the others. Most often it happens when we take on follow-up work with a client. It’s easy for us to say yes, without thinking about if it is a good project for us.

BM: How do we not do that anymore?

JJG: Constantly remind yourself what matters. Easy to lose sight of that. Really look at every opportunity that comes through the door, regardless of where it comes from.

Q: What do you do with internal clients? It just comes to you.

RF: The amount of attention you apply to projects is how you can control it.

BM: You can always quit.

JJG: Go back and tell your bosses we told you to quit.

(Laughter)

Q: How does AP find good clients?

Laura Kirkwood: They have to understand what they’re talking about. They have to have a team. They have to have us participate in the important conversations. It’s about mutual respect and engaging a problem together. It’s about figuring out a problem together.

RF: We do go through a very intensive process, but we still get it wrong. We get too excited about a problem or a client.

BM: Or everything changes once you are on the ground for a project.

Andrew Crow: We had a recent project that had a problem we were really engaged with and when we got there, they basically swapped the project on us. But having the rug pulled out from under us spooked us a bit.

RF: This happens on internal teams all the time.

SN: One of the things that is really challenging is that so much of the work is about people and people dynamics. Often early in a project, you need to establish how you act early in the project. But this doesn’t happen because you don’t know them and you want to understand the dynamics. If you sit back, it can set up a strange dynamic.

AC: We didn’t have the respect from the client, so when we needed to guide them or change things, there was no mutual respect.

When There is “No Time for Research”

Todd Wilkens: One of the things we often run into is companies telling you, “We have reams and reams of research and report, so you don’t have to do research, just design.” And you get there and it’s a marketing report. But you can’t tell people, “Hey, you really don’t know your customers.”

RF: There is always “Get on with the designing.” A hope you can just jump into the middle of a problem. Clients’ enthusiasm can be infectious. I’ve given too high-fidelity concepts to clients and then they get stuck on that and look at every level of detail. Need to have an appropriate level of fidelity. I continue to get it wrong, even after ten years of doing this. Delivering comps can be very dangerous.

Off-The-Rails in the MIddle of a Project

BM: Often the in-flight corrections make the problems worse.

AC: “If we just did this, it would be even better…” Those types of things–and you want to please the client–cause scope creep and budget and timeline and then they compound and build up and might keep you from launching at all. We should have been able to take a firmer stance. Didn’t have the ability to even say stop.

SN: We teach people how to treat us. What messages are we sending out? Are we a doormat, a vendor, a partner? It’s a fundamental problem.

BM: No one hires a consulting company unless they have a real problem to solve. People we like are in a bad spot. So how do we play bad cop with people that we like?

SN: I’m a horrible bad cop, so I usually make someone else do it, like a project manager or someone else in the organization.

JJG: If what you are doing is bad cop/bad cop, you need the good cop. Without a good cop, it puts you at odds with the client.

TW: Sometimes it is not just about being firm, but the root cause of the problem is that you aren’t talking about the right thing. Fighting over silly stuff like the number of wireframes.

RF: Recognizing the human element in things.

BM: What happens when you lose an executive sponsor?

RF: You make your life a nightmare. Need a bottom up approach to foster change. When it doesn’t work is when the people in charge are scared. CEO waited me out and once I was gone, all my work went away as well.

LK: Remember who your actual client is. It’s often not the person you are working with every day. It’s often people up above and you need to keep the ear of those people.

BM: Getting senior buy-in can open doors as well as cover your ass.

Q: How you talk internally that fosters these stories these way? We want to blame clients naturally.

BM: Every tuesday we talk about every project we’re working on and all the problems.

SN: You can start to see patterns between projects so it’s not a one-off event and we can all learn from. We have a tolerance for failure culture. It becomes a learning event, not something for disciplinary action.

BM: Although it can be that too!

Rachel Hinman on Mobile Persuasion

by Dan on May 18th, 2007

AP’s Rachel Hinman is a contributing author to the recently released Mobile Persuasion, edited by Stanford’s BJ Fogg and Dean Eckles.


Close
E-mail It