<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8230;but that&#8217;s all.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2008/06/06/but-thats-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2008/06/06/but-thats-all/</link>
	<description>Adaptive Path Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dean Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2008/06/06/but-thats-all/#comment-178884</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2008/06/06/but-thats-all/#comment-178884</guid>
		<description>What I find interesting about this is that there seems to be an underlying assumption that 'experience' is a functional, tangible thing and that by virtue of performance one experience should triumph over another.

But my gut feeling about the comment "we’re a BlackBerry shop" is that it does not rest purely in concerns based on performance and features, but on brand. Blackberry's brand is centered around business usage, the iPhone brand is not. That is not to say that the iPod cannot be considered by some as a tool for business, but there is a natural, and emotional barrier for businesses users to overcome before they will consider the iPhone.

I'm reminded of a rant I overheard recently delivered by an IT manager who was deeply upset about the rise in the number MacBook Pros he was having to supply to people outside of the design team. It went something like "Why do they need Mac laptops? It's like giving people Porsche as company cars". I would surmise that in the IT manager's mind the Mac brand represents luxury rather than business value, I would also guess that he was concerned about an extra overhead in terms of all of the Mac IT issues that he is less well equipped to support. Similarly, I believe that many of the consultants he supports would prefer to walk into a business meeting armed with an IBM Thinkpad, rather than a Mac, purely to meet an emotional desire to appear business like.

When we're designing experience I think it is important to remember something that marketeers have known and traded on for years: if you want people to buy into a product, it's as much about packing, and taking care of the emotional aspects of the experience, as it is the function and the features of a product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I find interesting about this is that there seems to be an underlying assumption that &#8216;experience&#8217; is a functional, tangible thing and that by virtue of performance one experience should triumph over another.</p>
<p>But my gut feeling about the comment &#8220;we’re a BlackBerry shop&#8221; is that it does not rest purely in concerns based on performance and features, but on brand. Blackberry&#8217;s brand is centered around business usage, the iPhone brand is not. That is not to say that the iPod cannot be considered by some as a tool for business, but there is a natural, and emotional barrier for businesses users to overcome before they will consider the iPhone.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m reminded of a rant I overheard recently delivered by an IT manager who was deeply upset about the rise in the number MacBook Pros he was having to supply to people outside of the design team. It went something like &#8220;Why do they need Mac laptops? It&#8217;s like giving people Porsche as company cars&#8221;. I would surmise that in the IT manager&#8217;s mind the Mac brand represents luxury rather than business value, I would also guess that he was concerned about an extra overhead in terms of all of the Mac IT issues that he is less well equipped to support. Similarly, I believe that many of the consultants he supports would prefer to walk into a business meeting armed with an IBM Thinkpad, rather than a Mac, purely to meet an emotional desire to appear business like.</p>
<p>When we&#8217;re designing experience I think it is important to remember something that marketeers have known and traded on for years: if you want people to buy into a product, it&#8217;s as much about packing, and taking care of the emotional aspects of the experience, as it is the function and the features of a product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamin Hegeman</title>
		<link>http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2008/06/06/but-thats-all/#comment-178782</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamin Hegeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2008/06/06/but-thats-all/#comment-178782</guid>
		<description>Perhaps it's a difference between a task-based and an experience-based point of view. They can both accomplish the same tasks (thus equal). But the iPhone experience is better. Maybe as designers we need to realize that some people aren't as wrapped up in the experience as we are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s a difference between a task-based and an experience-based point of view. They can both accomplish the same tasks (thus equal). But the iPhone experience is better. Maybe as designers we need to realize that some people aren&#8217;t as wrapped up in the experience as we are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Philpot</title>
		<link>http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2008/06/06/but-thats-all/#comment-178724</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Philpot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 02:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2008/06/06/but-thats-all/#comment-178724</guid>
		<description>The quote doesn't make sense to me. From what I understand, he is saying iPhone and Blackberry are equal, except that iPhone has a 'great user experience.' Well then that means they are not equal. In fact the user experience, to me, is on the top of the list when comparing or using technology. How can user experience be so under valued? It would be interesting to hear the CIO's definition of user experience. Perhaps we are talking about different things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The quote doesn&#8217;t make sense to me. From what I understand, he is saying iPhone and Blackberry are equal, except that iPhone has a &#8216;great user experience.&#8217; Well then that means they are not equal. In fact the user experience, to me, is on the top of the list when comparing or using technology. How can user experience be so under valued? It would be interesting to hear the CIO&#8217;s definition of user experience. Perhaps we are talking about different things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rishi</title>
		<link>http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2008/06/06/but-thats-all/#comment-178722</link>
		<dc:creator>Rishi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 19:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2008/06/06/but-thats-all/#comment-178722</guid>
		<description>This is not restricted to iPhone versus blackberry. The world of enterprise software/product design is ( and I suspect, will) always remain torn between the new and the traditional. Its extremely hard to bring in any sort of "radical" changes into the enterprise world ( even tabbed browsing with Firefox can be considered radical in many cases!). 

The quote reflects  the attitude of the enterprise toward user experience in general. Breaking rules and shifting paradigms doesn't seem to impress most folks in this world. At the same time, not using the latest phenomenons ( social networks,tag clouds, the works!) in the design is also considered negative. So, these users pose an extremely challenging situation for the UX designers, who need to balance the old with the new in a very smart way in order to sell their designs.And it is this tricky balancing act, that sometimes reduces the role of the designer into the guy who "makes it look better".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not restricted to iPhone versus blackberry. The world of enterprise software/product design is ( and I suspect, will) always remain torn between the new and the traditional. Its extremely hard to bring in any sort of &#8220;radical&#8221; changes into the enterprise world ( even tabbed browsing with Firefox can be considered radical in many cases!). </p>
<p>The quote reflects  the attitude of the enterprise toward user experience in general. Breaking rules and shifting paradigms doesn&#8217;t seem to impress most folks in this world. At the same time, not using the latest phenomenons ( social networks,tag clouds, the works!) in the design is also considered negative. So, these users pose an extremely challenging situation for the UX designers, who need to balance the old with the new in a very smart way in order to sell their designs.And it is this tricky balancing act, that sometimes reduces the role of the designer into the guy who &#8220;makes it look better&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Crow</title>
		<link>http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2008/06/06/but-thats-all/#comment-178714</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 00:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2008/06/06/but-thats-all/#comment-178714</guid>
		<description>Paul, I totally understand that Blackberry users are loyal to their devices and find that its experience fits their needs perfectly. Though I've tried to be a Blackberry user in the past, it didn't solve the problems I was looking to have solved.

One of the points I was trying to make with the original post was that great user experience is often considered a nice-to-have or something that is tacked on later perhaps by making a slick UI. Many product designers fail to realize that the user experience is an actual feature and one of the most important ones you can build into a product. 

The quote above seemed to downplay the product experience in search of newer and more features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, I totally understand that Blackberry users are loyal to their devices and find that its experience fits their needs perfectly. Though I&#8217;ve tried to be a Blackberry user in the past, it didn&#8217;t solve the problems I was looking to have solved.</p>
<p>One of the points I was trying to make with the original post was that great user experience is often considered a nice-to-have or something that is tacked on later perhaps by making a slick UI. Many product designers fail to realize that the user experience is an actual feature and one of the most important ones you can build into a product. </p>
<p>The quote above seemed to downplay the product experience in search of newer and more features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Blunden</title>
		<link>http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2008/06/06/but-thats-all/#comment-178707</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Blunden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 09:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2008/06/06/but-thats-all/#comment-178707</guid>
		<description>Our company (www.foviance.com) have both iphone and Blackberry users amongst our staff and it is fair to say that whilst the Blackberry users don't feel as 'cool' as the iphone users they are just as happy with the usability of the device. For sure the iphone has some really nice features but they are different really nice features to those that the Blackberry has. For example the usability of the address book integration with the phone dialer is excellent. 
I think if there is one thing that the introduction of the iphone has proven, as the Razor did before, being an anything 'shop' is a little naive as technology moves faster than any of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our company (www.foviance.com) have both iphone and Blackberry users amongst our staff and it is fair to say that whilst the Blackberry users don&#8217;t feel as &#8216;cool&#8217; as the iphone users they are just as happy with the usability of the device. For sure the iphone has some really nice features but they are different really nice features to those that the Blackberry has. For example the usability of the address book integration with the phone dialer is excellent.<br />
I think if there is one thing that the introduction of the iphone has proven, as the Razor did before, being an anything &#8217;shop&#8217; is a little naive as technology moves faster than any of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
