<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Adaptive Path Green?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2008/04/22/is-adaptive-path-green/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2008/04/22/is-adaptive-path-green/</link>
	<description>Adaptive Path Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Hodgson</title>
		<link>http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2008/04/22/is-adaptive-path-green/#comment-177403</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hodgson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 02:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2008/04/22/is-adaptive-path-green/#comment-177403</guid>
		<description>I am very pleased to hear that you have joined the Designers Accord, it is an excellent organization.

The following statement in your post however confused me: "Our consideration for the environment will never supersede our passion for good experience design". 

If it really came down to that decision are you saying that the virtual is more important than the real? That the human frustration that comes from troublesome user design is more important than the human misery that will be caused by climate change?

Somehow I doubt that. So I would like to have more clarity around your intentions :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very pleased to hear that you have joined the Designers Accord, it is an excellent organization.</p>
<p>The following statement in your post however confused me: &#8220;Our consideration for the environment will never supersede our passion for good experience design&#8221;. </p>
<p>If it really came down to that decision are you saying that the virtual is more important than the real? That the human frustration that comes from troublesome user design is more important than the human misery that will be caused by climate change?</p>
<p>Somehow I doubt that. So I would like to have more clarity around your intentions <img src='http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
