<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on ICSID/IDSA 07</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2007/10/22/thoughts-on-icsididsa-07/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2007/10/22/thoughts-on-icsididsa-07/</link>
	<description>Adaptive Path Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 00:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeong</title>
		<link>http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2007/10/22/thoughts-on-icsididsa-07/#comment-175960</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2007/10/22/thoughts-on-icsididsa-07/#comment-175960</guid>
		<description>Hi Peter. Sorry I missed the IDSA gathering. To the point, I agree with Sabine. Especially where I am , which takes on strategy and vision to communicate the value of design, we are beginning more and more to touch products to communicate the value of design. I think your summary was quite well stated. Design does need to be used for thinking and making. One without the other is crippling.

Jeong</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Peter. Sorry I missed the IDSA gathering. To the point, I agree with Sabine. Especially where I am , which takes on strategy and vision to communicate the value of design, we are beginning more and more to touch products to communicate the value of design. I think your summary was quite well stated. Design does need to be used for thinking and making. One without the other is crippling.</p>
<p>Jeong</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
