<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why is honesty such a lonely word?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2007/03/19/why-is-honesty-such-a-lonely-word/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2007/03/19/why-is-honesty-such-a-lonely-word/</link>
	<description>Adaptive Path Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kate R</title>
		<link>http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2007/03/19/why-is-honesty-such-a-lonely-word/#comment-60473</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 03:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2007/03/19/why-is-honesty-such-a-lonely-word/#comment-60473</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm. Not sure I agree that the always being available to others is quite so key in self-definition of identity. I think boundaries are good, especially when it comes to maintaining control over ones own time with regards to social responsiveness.

If I missed an emergency call from a family member, I'd certainly be concerned about the nature of the call. However, I'm not ready to always be available as a way to feel more responsible. I know family is important and my family knows I know family is important. They also know that sometimes I like to be left alone.

Frankly, I'm ready to feel a slight loss of identity if it will contribute to my sense of sanity.

But then, I've been known to sit beside a ringing phone and not answer it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm. Not sure I agree that the always being available to others is quite so key in self-definition of identity. I think boundaries are good, especially when it comes to maintaining control over ones own time with regards to social responsiveness.</p>
<p>If I missed an emergency call from a family member, I&#8217;d certainly be concerned about the nature of the call. However, I&#8217;m not ready to always be available as a way to feel more responsible. I know family is important and my family knows I know family is important. They also know that sometimes I like to be left alone.</p>
<p>Frankly, I&#8217;m ready to feel a slight loss of identity if it will contribute to my sense of sanity.</p>
<p>But then, I&#8217;ve been known to sit beside a ringing phone and not answer it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel Hinman</title>
		<link>http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2007/03/19/why-is-honesty-such-a-lonely-word/#comment-60234</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Hinman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 16:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2007/03/19/why-is-honesty-such-a-lonely-word/#comment-60234</guid>
		<description>I wonder if we're compelled to keep our phones on because of the depth of the social connections we have to the people who contact us through them - they are the people we rely on the most to shape our identity. 

Whether replying to an email or answering a phone call - a response is a way to reinforce a social connection. But it's what's behind the social connection that drives that Pavlovian response to mobile phones. Sure people are social - but why? I think it's because our perceptions of ourselves - our identity - is shaped by our social connections. 

Waiting a couple hours or a day to respond to an email on my PC from a colleague might mean I am an irresponsible co-worker, or not as responsive as I should be.

Missing the emergency mobile call from a family member might mean I was a thoughtless child or that I was the type of person for whom family wasn't important.

I wouldn't like to think of myself or have others think of me as an irresponsible co-worker, but I could live with it.

Being thought of as a thoughtless family member - I'll keep my phone on to prevent that. 

I think, somehow, the Pavlovian response to phones and the compulsion to be "always available" is about identity management. We don't turn off our phones for fear of how it would be perceived by others to not respond or miss an opportunity to reinforce our identity through those relationships.

What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if we&#8217;re compelled to keep our phones on because of the depth of the social connections we have to the people who contact us through them - they are the people we rely on the most to shape our identity. </p>
<p>Whether replying to an email or answering a phone call - a response is a way to reinforce a social connection. But it&#8217;s what&#8217;s behind the social connection that drives that Pavlovian response to mobile phones. Sure people are social - but why? I think it&#8217;s because our perceptions of ourselves - our identity - is shaped by our social connections. </p>
<p>Waiting a couple hours or a day to respond to an email on my PC from a colleague might mean I am an irresponsible co-worker, or not as responsive as I should be.</p>
<p>Missing the emergency mobile call from a family member might mean I was a thoughtless child or that I was the type of person for whom family wasn&#8217;t important.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t like to think of myself or have others think of me as an irresponsible co-worker, but I could live with it.</p>
<p>Being thought of as a thoughtless family member - I&#8217;ll keep my phone on to prevent that. </p>
<p>I think, somehow, the Pavlovian response to phones and the compulsion to be &#8220;always available&#8221; is about identity management. We don&#8217;t turn off our phones for fear of how it would be perceived by others to not respond or miss an opportunity to reinforce our identity through those relationships.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiffany</title>
		<link>http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2007/03/19/why-is-honesty-such-a-lonely-word/#comment-59530</link>
		<dc:creator>tiffany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2007/03/19/why-is-honesty-such-a-lonely-word/#comment-59530</guid>
		<description>Eh, I think big difference is a practical one: mobiles make noise. PCs don't. I can't stand the constant stream of blips, buzzes and beeps that come with receiving Twitters on my mobile. So I don't.

Methinks that should be Twitter's next feature: the ability to select &lt;em&gt;how&lt;/em&gt; each friend can tweet you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eh, I think big difference is a practical one: mobiles make noise. PCs don&#8217;t. I can&#8217;t stand the constant stream of blips, buzzes and beeps that come with receiving Twitters on my mobile. So I don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Methinks that should be Twitter&#8217;s next feature: the ability to select <em>how</em> each friend can tweet you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Szuc</title>
		<link>http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2007/03/19/why-is-honesty-such-a-lonely-word/#comment-59528</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Szuc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2007/03/19/why-is-honesty-such-a-lonely-word/#comment-59528</guid>
		<description>When is it ok to switch off? 

We all have the ability/control to turn off the PC, instant messaging, email and the mobile, but it seems there are different levels of expectation around each of these communication channels. 

For example, some don't see it as acceptable to turn off a mobile phone or even not have one at all. Expectations seem to be changing but are people adapting to that change well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When is it ok to switch off? </p>
<p>We all have the ability/control to turn off the PC, instant messaging, email and the mobile, but it seems there are different levels of expectation around each of these communication channels. </p>
<p>For example, some don&#8217;t see it as acceptable to turn off a mobile phone or even not have one at all. Expectations seem to be changing but are people adapting to that change well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
