home > services 

Adaptive Path Blog

The Team

Dan

SXSW 2007 Reflection

by Dan

I’m writing this in the Denver airport en route home from South by Southwest Interactive 2007. I thought I’d jot down my impressions of this year’s conference.

SXSW gotten very large (again, so I am told). I have no idea how many attendees there where this year, but it felt in the thousands. There were many people I know were there and that I wanted to meet or talk to that I simply didn’t get to see or saw from afar. Granted, I was there for fewer days than most people, but three days should be enough to at least say hello to everyone you want at a conference.

The splitting up of the interactive sessions in three different locations (one on a different, hard to reach floor) didn’t help this fragmentation effect either. Unlike previous years, you couldn’t just stand in the hallway and expect that everyone would eventually flow past you because there were three hallways. Similarly, with there being half a dozen parties and events going on at any given time, it was hard to decide between them. It made you have to go with the flow, moving rapidly from party to party. I suppose this isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

In general, I am becoming less and less enamored of panels as presentation format. I know it is supposed to spark conversation and lively debate, but it seldom does. I suppose they are a way for people who aren’t good presenters or speakers to give their views, but IMHO bad presenters will probably make bad panelists. A great panel is probably filled with a set of great speakers–preferably with conflicting viewpoints.

During some parts of the day, there were ten sessions to choose from. Which on the surface is awesome, but I missed some of the community feeling you get with a smaller number of tracks. The power sessions (which lasted 30 minutes instead of an hour), were an interesting idea. As someone who does some speaking, 45 minutes is probably a better length. I’m guessing there are some lengths that work well for speaking lengths: 10 minutes for a single, simple idea. 45 minutes for a complex, developed idea. And an hour and half for a connected cluster of ideas. At least, this has been my experience.

The parties and social events were (as always) great. SXSW is the social event of the geek year. 8-Bit was insanely good, an 80s flashback with a playlist straight from my prom. Yahoo! party with its glowing purple ice cubes was better than last year. Best, of course, are the chance encounters, bumping into people and following them (or them following you) to dinners or lunch or drinks. You never know where you’ll end up some days, and that ’s what makes SXSW such fun.

One Response to “SXSW 2007 Reflection”

  1. Demanding Satisfaction at SxSW at Demand Satisfaction! Says:

    [...] The parties and social events were (as always) great. SXSW is the social event of the geek year. 8-Bit was insanely good, an 80s flashback with a playlist straight from my prom. (Adaptive Path) [...]

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


Where do great ideas come from?

At Adaptive Path, our ideas are driven by the work we do. We do consulting for user interface and user experience design, and offer conferences, training and education for UX designers.

From field ethnography, UI wireframes and task flows, to visual design and implementation, we do it and we teach it.

Learn more in our video, Adaptive Path in 2 ½ Minutes:

ap-video

Want to know more about Adaptive Path? You should read more about our services or contact us to find out how we can help you!

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive essays, appearance dates and other news from Adaptive Path.