<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MXSF 2007: Interview with Caterina Fake</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2007/02/12/mxsf-2007-interview-with-caterina-fake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2007/02/12/mxsf-2007-interview-with-caterina-fake/</link>
	<description>Adaptive Path Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Over Flickr en Slashdot. &#171; Johan</title>
		<link>http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2007/02/12/mxsf-2007-interview-with-caterina-fake/#comment-53123</link>
		<dc:creator>Over Flickr en Slashdot. &#171; Johan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 14:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2007/02/12/mxsf-2007-interview-with-caterina-fake/#comment-53123</guid>
		<description>[...] Over Flickr en&#160;Slashdot.    Posted maart 5, 2007    Wist je dat Flickr orgineel een game-project was, dat bij wijze van laatste kans (voor het geld opgesoupeerd was) zich herpositioneerde naar de hudige foto website? Hier kan je dus letterlijk spreken van een &#8216;playability&#8217;-factor&#8230; Lees het interview met Caternia Fake van Flickr (&#8217;t zal toch wel een echt interview zijn zeker?). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Over Flickr en&nbsp;Slashdot.    Posted maart 5, 2007    Wist je dat Flickr orgineel een game-project was, dat bij wijze van laatste kans (voor het geld opgesoupeerd was) zich herpositioneerde naar de hudige foto website? Hier kan je dus letterlijk spreken van een &#8216;playability&#8217;-factor&#8230; Lees het interview met Caternia Fake van Flickr (&#8217;t zal toch wel een echt interview zijn zeker?). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angel Invenstment Journal &#187; Valuation Breakdown of a Start-up</title>
		<link>http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2007/02/12/mxsf-2007-interview-with-caterina-fake/#comment-49456</link>
		<dc:creator>Angel Invenstment Journal &#187; Valuation Breakdown of a Start-up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 21:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2007/02/12/mxsf-2007-interview-with-caterina-fake/#comment-49456</guid>
		<description>[...] Even though this breakdown makes the percent of the valuation attributed to the product or service appear to be very minimal (10%), Bill mentions that there are other factors that are directly attributed to the product or service, such as size of the opportunity. But it is obvious that the management team of the start-up is very important. Some of the most successful companies are not a result of the initial product idea. For example, you probably know that Flickr started as an online multiplayer game. The team behind the company adapted and made it into something huge. So just because a company has a brilliant idea or a fantastic technology, it does not support a huge valuation. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Even though this breakdown makes the percent of the valuation attributed to the product or service appear to be very minimal (10%), Bill mentions that there are other factors that are directly attributed to the product or service, such as size of the opportunity. But it is obvious that the management team of the start-up is very important. Some of the most successful companies are not a result of the initial product idea. For example, you probably know that Flickr started as an online multiplayer game. The team behind the company adapted and made it into something huge. So just because a company has a brilliant idea or a fantastic technology, it does not support a huge valuation. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Linkage [02-16-07] at Experience Planner by Scott Weisbrod</title>
		<link>http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2007/02/12/mxsf-2007-interview-with-caterina-fake/#comment-49125</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Linkage [02-16-07] at Experience Planner by Scott Weisbrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 19:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2007/02/12/mxsf-2007-interview-with-caterina-fake/#comment-49125</guid>
		<description>[...] Interview with Caterina Fake [Adaptive Path] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Interview with Caterina Fake [Adaptive Path] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adaptive path &#187; blog &#187; blog archive &#187; Questions I didn&#8217;t get a chance to ask Caterina Fake</title>
		<link>http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2007/02/12/mxsf-2007-interview-with-caterina-fake/#comment-46319</link>
		<dc:creator>adaptive path &#187; blog &#187; blog archive &#187; Questions I didn&#8217;t get a chance to ask Caterina Fake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 05:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog/2007/02/12/mxsf-2007-interview-with-caterina-fake/#comment-46319</guid>
		<description>[...] Today at MX, I interviewed Flickr co-founder Caterina Fake on stage. Dan wrote up our discussion. Here are some questions I didn&#8217;t get to ask (because of time) If you have an answer, post it in the comments: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Today at MX, I interviewed Flickr co-founder Caterina Fake on stage. Dan wrote up our discussion. Here are some questions I didn&#8217;t get to ask (because of time) If you have an answer, post it in the comments: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
