home > services 

Adaptive Path Blog

The Team

Rachel H

Shades of Online Community

by Rachel Hinman

The topic of online community has come up a lot on a recent project. I’ve heard some powerful stories about Yelp, Gay.com, Craigslist, Tripadvisor, Citysearch, Amazon… and more. It occurred to me that there is more than one way to engage with users and foster a sense of community online. Here are some ideas on the shades of community.

1.The Inner Circle
Two common characteristics this type of online community seems to share are 1) the presence of a strong point of view and 2) clear values that people can align with and use to identify themselves in the world. Unlike strong corporate brands, the values of this type of community are created by and evolve with the ebb and flow of the community. Credibility is created through users contributing relevant content that aligns with the values. It seems to be less about numbers and more about relevance. Users here have editorial control of the content. This is where the zealot-like participation happens – as it should since users here own and shepherd the brand.

2. Word on the Street
From rating an experience with a product to seeking retribution for bad restaurant service, folks love these online mechanisms that surface user opinion. Not really sure if this constitutes community since it’s more about people taking ownership of their experiences and using those experiences for self expression than providing the mechanisms for a dialogue. Users get the “real story from regular people like me” here. The power and credibility comes from the timeliness of the information. This is where numbers start to matter.

3. Co-existence
This flavor of community is where user feedback co-exists with an editorial position – Citysearch and Amazon are good examples. Users enjoy a good degree of anonymity – it’s less about ‘who’ is contributing and more about numbers. A funny thing starts to happen with opinion here; variance is good if not required for credibility. A review that is “too positive” could have been bought or the negative reviews were edited out.

4. Brands that Resonate
This is the “I am the brands I buy” – where people appropriate brands to express themselves in the world. This is a top-down kinda place where it’s less about expressing your own unique perspective and voice and more about aligning with the brand values that have been determined by somebody else. Credibility is created by the brand having strong characteristics that resonate with people. Here is where brand shepherding and management at the corporate level is important.

Make sense? Off the mark?

5 Responses to “Shades of Online Community”

  1. socialwrite.com » Shades of Online Community Says:

    [...] with users and foster a sense of community online. Here are some ideas on the shades of community.” # [...]

  2. Brandon Schauer Says:

    There’s some nice, nuanced thinking here. However, the roll-up of trust as you present it across the x-axis of your diagram seems to break down at times. While I might trust say a heavily reviewed restaurant on citysearch than a single author’s review on BBC if I’m looking for a recommendation (a subjective choice), I’m sure going to trust the BBC more when it comes to facts (the objective).

    I wonder if you’re only speaking of certain dimensions of trust, such as faith in benevolence versus faith in competence. I’m also wondering if the x-axis should be deep to shallow instead of high to low. Or maybe something slightly more objective such as relevance or validity is appropriate. Or, maybe you just can’t chart trust…

  3. digital aesthetics » Shades of Online Community Says:

    [...] Share This [...]

  4. Bill Johnston Says:

    This is a nice atempt at categorizing types of online communities.

    I agree with Brandon that the X-axis of trust doesn’t hold up. As information brands, the BBC and WSJ are highly trusted (I would guess) by the majority of their community members.

    Another interesting riff on this diagram might be to do a version that is member-centric and shows the relationship between member and the larger community ecosystem, i.e. I am a member of the Craigslist, Yelp, Amazon and WSJ communities.

    Regardless, it’s very cool that you are thinking through this and posting about it.

    I look forward to seeing more :)

  5. online » Shades of Online Community Says:

    [...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptThe topic of online community has come up a lot on a recent project. I’ve heard some powerful stories about Yelp, Gay.com, Craigslist, Tripadvisor, Citysearch, Amazon… and more. It occurred to me that there is more than one way to … [...]


Where do great ideas come from?

At Adaptive Path, our ideas are driven by the work we do. We do consulting for user interface and user experience design, and offer conferences, training and education for UX designers.

From field ethnography, UI wireframes and task flows, to visual design and implementation, we do it and we teach it.

Learn more in our video, Adaptive Path in 2 ½ Minutes:

ap-video

Want to know more about Adaptive Path? You should read more about our services or contact us to find out how we can help you!

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive essays, appearance dates and other news from Adaptive Path.